Affichage des articles dont le libellé est obama's birth certificate. Afficher tous les articles
Affichage des articles dont le libellé est obama's birth certificate. Afficher tous les articles

mardi 24 mai 2011

Smoking Gun: Gov’t moles alerted investigator of planted Obama birth certificate 2 months before release

Aaron Dykes & Alex Jones
Infowars.com
May 24, 2011

Speaking today on the Alex Jones Show, investigative journalist Jerome R. Corsi dropped a huge bombshell. Dr. Corsi provided proof that he was alerted to an on-going plot to release a fake more than two months before President Obama released his purported long-form birth certificate.

Corsi supplied Infowars.com with time-stamped Microsoft Word documents [.ZIP] of five unpublished World Net Daily investigative drafts, written between February 23 and February 24, 2011, two months before Obama’s April 27 birth certificate press conference. The unpublished reports confirm that moles inside the Hawaiian State government, including one inside the Department of Health, had warned Corsi of a plan by Obama operatives to plant and then publicly release a forged birth certificate.

The veteran investigative journalist released more details during a live appearance today, two hours and 8 minutes into the three hour broadcast.

LISTEN TO THE INTERVIEW HERE:

Three weeks before the April 27th Obama press conference, Corsi was contacted again by his informants, who had been keeping a close eye on the birth records. It had happened. Prior to April 2011, there had been no Barack Obama birth certificate in the sequentially numbered book, but as of early April, it had suddenly appeared in the records.

Remember, in January 2011, Hawaiian Governor-elect Neil Abercrombie had told reporters that he was unable to locate President Obama’s birth certificate, but a few months later it had magically appeared. Now here’s the smoking gun bombshells: #1 Corsi has witnesses inside the Hawaiian government that accurately called what was going to happen, and who can be called as witnesses once Corsi files his criminal charges with the FBI.

#2 Obama Took the Bait – World Net Daily publisher Joseph Farah and investigator Jerome Corsi are on record via e-mail and in front of staff discussing the fact that the moles had warned them of the planted birth certificate, and the plan to roll it out. Farah and Corsi again decided, as they had done with their earlier February 24 report, to not go public and let Obama commit himself openly to the forgery.

Corsi is preparing to release even more information to the press in the coming days and weeks. But to recap, World Net Daily has the proof that months before Obama rolled-out his supposed long-form birth certificate, WND.com knew that the birth certificate was indeed not there but would soon be planted. The initial intel from February indicated a plan by Democratic operatives to release it as an October surprise for the 2012 election.

  • A d v e r t i s e m e n t

The imminent publication of Dr. Corsi’s book, Where’s the Birth Certficate, forced the White House hand to speed up the release. Think about it: after two-and-a-half years and $2 million in lawyer fees to stonewall the release of the birth certificate, President Obama sent his lawyer to Hawaii to suddenly produce it. This timeline only adds additional credibility to the account put forward by Corsi.

Add to all of this the fact that the Kenyan government has now released two new documents confirming that the U.S. ambassador to Kenya under George W. Bush requested information on then Senator Obama’s birth records in Kenya. In the government letters we discover that the Kenyan government carried out an investigation searching for the birth records and confirmed that the documents had been criminally removed.

Fresh food that lasts from eFoodsDirect (AD)

Below is the unedited fifth draft from February 24, 2011 unpublished World Net Daily story covering the intent to plant a forged birth certificate in the Hawaiian Health Department records or click here for a ZIP file of the original drafts. Directly below is a screenshot of the Microsoft Word timestamp confirming that it was written February 2011.

Timestamp February 24, 2011 - WND.com Jerome Corsi unpublished article citing plot.

————


WND Warned to Block Possible Future Release of Fraudulent Obama Birth Records

 

States Passing Eligibility Laws Advised to Submit Original Obama Birth Documents to Forensic Examination

By

Jerome R. Corsi

WND has been warned that certain government officials in Hawaii have been contemplating releasing fraudulent Obama birth records and that WND has in its possession information that will be able to prove the forgery.

According to a top-level WND confidential source with access to officials within the Hawaii government, the long-form birth certificates issued to the Nordyke twins one day after Barack Obama was born create a barrier for anyone attempting to produce a fraudulent long-form, Kapi’olani-generated birth certificate for Obama.

In a series of emails and phone calls, the Hawaiian source pointed out to WND the key to understanding why forging a Kapi’olani birth certificate for Obama is difficult lies in an analysis of the certificate numbers the Hawaii Department of Health issued to twin daughters born to Eleanor Nordyke at the Kapi’olani Maternity and Gynecological Hospital on Aug. 5, 1961, one day after Obama was supposedly born at the facility.

The source warned WND that Obama supporters in Hawaii are contemplating the release of fraudulent Obama birth records in the run-up to the 2012 presidential elections.

WND’s confidential source further warned that any fraudulent Obama birth records originating in Hawaii will be sufficiently expert that the forgery can only be detected by forensic examination of the originals, not from digitized copies or photographs circulated of the forgery on the Internet.

WND cannot release the identity of the confidential source without risking the person’s life.

Speculation continues in Hawaii that Governor Neal Abercrombie asked Dr. Neal Palafox to withdraw his nomination as director of the Hawaii Department of Health because Palafox was unable to produce for Governor Abercrombie legitimate Hawaii Department of Health birth records that would substantiate Abercrombie’s repeated claims Obama was born at Kapi’olani, and Palafox was determined to prevent any forgeries from emerging within the Hawaii DOH.

The WND confidential source urged WND to investigate Abercrombie’s decision to remove Dr. Palafox in relation to the possibility Dr. Palafox refused to participate in a scheme to create fraudulent Obama birth records or otherwise misrepresent existing records to dispel continuing doubts over whether Obama was born in Hawaii or not.

The Honolulu Star Advertiser has reported today http://www.staradvertiser.com/news/hawaiinews/20110224_Answers_sought_on_Palafox_issue.html that Hawaii Senate Minority leader Sam Slom, http://washingtonexaminer.com/politics/2011/02/hawaii-dispiriting-glimpse-one-party-rule the only Republican in the 25-person Democratic-controlled Hawaii Senate, has asked Abercrombie to provide additional information regarding Abercrombie’s decision to ask Dr. Palafox to withdraw his nomination.

In a letter to Abercrombie dated last Friday, Slom said he has confirmed with federal sources that Dr. Palafox is not under any investigation, the reason Abercrombie’s office alleged was behind the governor’s request for Palafox to withdraw.

“If he is indeed innocent, let’s clear this matter up and allow the Senate to consider him for the position,” Slom wrote to Abercrombie. “The Health Department has a number of problems and strong leadership is required.”

The Hawaii Reporter http://www.hawaiireporter.com/palafox-should-be-publicly-cleared-back-at-health-department-job-if-he-has-been-wrongly-accused/123 published on Friday, Feb. 18, a complete text of Slom’s letter to Abercrombie.

“As a member of the Health Committee who would be considering his [Palafox’s] or another nomination, I am requesting additional information to determine whether or not he was falsely accused,” Slom wrote Abercrombie. “It would be unfortunate to have these allegations hanging over him if they are not ture.”

Here is the crux of the problem any forger attempting to produce false Obama birth records faces:

As WND reported in July 2009, http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=105347 a close examination of the long-form birth certificates issued by Kapi’olani to the Nordyke twins reveals that the number sequence given the twins precedes the certificate number given President Obama, even though President Obama was born supposedly at the same hospital a day earlier than the Nordyke Twins.

Susan Nordyke, the first twin born, was born at 2:12 pm local Hawaii time on Aug. 5, 1961, and was given Certificate Number 151 – 61—10637, which was filed with the Hawaii Registrar on Aug. 11, 1961.

Gretchen Nordyke, the second twin born, was born at 2:17 pm local Hawaii time on Aug. 5, 1961, and was given Certificate Number 151—61—10638, which was also filed with the Hawaii Registrar on Aug. 11, 1961.

Yet, according to the Certification of Live Birth, or COLB, released by FactCheck.org during the 2008 presidential campaign,

Media_httpwwwfactchec_ebhdf
Barack Obama was given a higher certificate number than the Nordyke twins, File Number 151—1961—10641, even though he was born on Aug. 4, 1961, the day before the Nordyke twins, and his birth was registered with the Hawaii Department of Health registrar three days earlier, on Aug. 8, 1961.

So, any long-form, Kapi’olani Hospital-generated birth certificate for Obama carrying the certificate number displayed on the FactCheck.org COLB would be an obvious forgery.

If Obama had been born on Aug. 4, 1961, as claimed, the certificate number of his
long-form, Kapi’olani Hospital-generated birth certificate would have carried a number preceding the certificate numbers on the authentic Nordyke twin birth certificates.

Yet, on the other hand, if a forger were to release, a long-form, Kapi’olani Hospital-generated birth certificate with a number earlier in sequence to the certificate numbers for the Kapi’olani twins, that would prove the FactCheck.org COLB was a fraud, as has been widely speculated since the document first appeared on the Internet.

Here are the Nordyke twins birth certificates:

null

Here is the FactCheck.org Obama COLB with the certificate number not blocked out:

null

Source:

Media_httpwwwfactchec_ebhdf

It turns out WND has possessed this information regarding the certificate numbers on the Nordyke twins’ birth certificates for over two years without realizing the importance of this information in blocking Obama supporters from releasing fraudulent birth documents created possibly by reconstructing original documents drawn from the Hawaii Department of Health archives.

The analysis further suggests that in order to prevent a false Obama birth certificate surfacing, possibly even from within the Hawaiian government, proposed state laws regarding presidential eligibility should specify that state election officials have the right to conduct an expert forensic examination of original copies of presidential birth documents to establish authenticity.

The Hawaii newspaper birth announcements

Another important anomaly blocking a possible forgery involves the Hawaii newspaper birth announcements for Obama and for the Nordyke twins.

The FactCheck.org COLB indicates the Obama birth was born on Aug. 4, 1961, and the birth was registered with the Hawaii Department of Health on Aug. 8, 1961.

The Obama birth announcements appeared in the Honolulu newspapers on Aug. 13, 1961, five days after the birth was registered.

The Nordyke twins’ birth certificates indicates they were born the next day, Aug. 5, 1961, and their births were registered with the Hawaii Department of Health on Aug. 11, 1961, three days after Obama’s birth was registered, despite Obama being born a day earlier.

The Nordyke twins’ birth announcements appeared in the Honolulu newspapers on Aug. 16, five days after the Nordyke twins’ births were registered.

Here is the announcement of the Obama birth as it appeared in the Honolulu Sunday Advertiser, on Aug. 13, 1961:

null

Or, shown in detail from the Honolulu Star Bulletin, on Aug. 13, 1961:

null

Here is the announcement of the Nordyke twins’ birth as it appeared in the Honolulu Advertiser on Aug. 16, 1961:

null

Source: http://myveryownpointofview.wordpress.com/2010/01/07/editing/

Eleanor Nordyke has speculated her twins got an earlier birth certificate number because she entered Kapi’olani Hospital earlier than Ann Dunham and gave birth later.

Still, no records for Ann Dunham having been a patient at Kapi’olani in 1961 or of Obama having been born at the hospital on Aug. 4, 1961, have ever been released by the hospital.

Any successful forgery of Obama birth records would have to agree with the dates listed in Kapi’olani patient and birth records for the document to be authentic.

If Kapi’olani Hospital records show that Ann Dunham was admitted to the hospital prior to Eleanor Nordyke, there would be no explanation for Obama’s birth record to have a higher certificate number.

Forgers are further boxed in by the registration date listed on the Obama FactCheck.org COLB, such any forged Obama long-form, Kapi’olani birth certificate would have to have not only a later certificate number than that given the Nordyke twins, but also an earlier registration date.

The point is that any document claimed to be a Kapi’olani-generated birth certificate for Obama would both need to be subject to expert forensic examination of the original document to determine its authenticity, but would also need to be checked against Kapi’olani-maintained patient records and registration records maintained by the Hawaii Department of Health.


LibraryThing.com

jeudi 28 avril 2011

New Obama Birth Certificate is a Forgery

New Obama Birth Certificate is a Forgery
  •   The Alex Jones Channel Alex Jones Show podcast Prison Planet TV Infowars.com Twitter Alex Jones' Facebook Infowars store

Kurt Nimmo
Infowars.com
April 28, 2011

Our investigation of the purported Obama birth certificate released by Hawaiian authorities today reveals the document is a shoddily contrived hoax. Infowars.com computer specialists dismissed the document as a fraud soon after examining it.

Check out the document released by WhiteHouse.gov for yourself.

New Obama Birth Certificate is a Forgery obamabreakout

Upon first inspection, the document appears to be a photocopy taken from state records and printed on official green paper. However, when the government released PDF is taken into the image editing program Adobe Illustrator, we discover a number of separate elements that reveal the document is not a single scan on paper, as one might surmise. Elements are placed in layers or editing boxes over the scan and green textured paper, which is to say the least unusual.

When sections of the document are enlarged significantly, we discover glaring inconsistencies. For instance, it appears the date stamped on the document has been altered. Moreover, the document contains text, numbers, and lines with suspicious white borders indicating these items were pasted from the original scan and dropped over a background image of green paper.

VIDEO: Alex Jones gives proof that Obama’s purported birth certificate is fraud.


Let’s assume the state of Hawaii scanned the original document and placed it on the green textured background. This does not explain the broken out or separate elements. There is no logical reason for this to be done unless the government planned to modify the document and make it appear to be something other than it is.

There are two elements of interest, as shown in the image to the above – both entries for the date accepted by the local registry. This appears to have been modified in an image editing program.

The media was quick to dispel the fact the document was modified. “Our analysis of the latest controversy: The original birth certificate was probably in a ‘negative’ form, and someone at the White House took it upon themselves to doctor it up so the form can be readable,” writesJoe Brooks for Wireupdate.

Nathan Goulding, writing for the National Review, tells us anybody can open the White House released PDF in Illustrator and it will break out into layers. “I’ve confirmed that scanning an image, converting it to a PDF, optimizing that PDF, and then opening it up in Illustrator, does in fact create layers similar to what is seen in the birth certificate PDF. You can try it yourself at home,” he writes.

Indeed, but this does not answer the question why in the Obama birth certificate PDF the layers or elements contain dates – which appear to be modified – and the signature of the state registrar. If the document was acquired from state records in whole, why was it necessary to add elements? Goulding and Brooks do not address this issue.

These layers are also revealed by the White House issued PDF’s hex file in freeware hex editor. Within its code are listed 8 image masks, which if changed from value “true” to “false” turn off and on to reveal the layers as demonstrated in the video and in Illustrator. Whether these represent compression artifacts or other digitizing processes, or whether these masks represent deliberate manipulation remains to be conclusively shown.

<< /Length 17 0 R /Type /XObject /Subtype /Image /Width 123 /Height 228 /ImageMask
true /BitsPerComponent 1 /Filter /FlateDecode >>
<< /Length 13 0 R /Type /XObject /Subtype /Image /Width 199 /Height 778 /ImageMask
true /BitsPerComponent 1 /Filter /FlateDecode >>
<< /Length 19 0 R /Type /XObject /Subtype /Image /Width 47 /Height 216 /ImageMask
true /BitsPerComponent 1 /Filter /FlateDecode >>

<< /Length 15 0 R /Type /XObject /Subtype /Image /Width 42 /Height 274 /ImageMask
true /BitsPerComponent 1 /Filter /FlateDecode >>

<< /Length 10 0 R /Type /XObject /Subtype /Image /Width 1454 /Height 1819
/ImageMask true /BitsPerComponent 1 /Filter /FlateDecode >>

<< /Length 25 0 R /Type /XObject /Subtype /Image /Width 132 /Height 142 /ImageMask
true /BitsPerComponent 1 /Filter /FlateDecode >>

<< /Length 23 0 R /Type /XObject /Subtype /Image /Width 243 /Height 217 /ImageMask
true /BitsPerComponent 1 /Filter /FlateDecode >>

<< /Length 21 0 R /Type /XObject /Subtype /Image /Width 34 /Height 70 /ImageMask
true /BitsPerComponent 1 /Filter /FlateDecode >>

New Obama Birth Certificate is a Forgery 161008pptv3

Stock up with Fresh Food that lasts with eFoodsDirect (AD)

As Market-Ticker.org points out, it may prove to be significant that two of the boxes appear over both of the “date accepted” boxes, as well as the “Mother’s occupation box.” Was there a need to tamper with the dates on the document or other areas? The recent stamp date and issuing signature of the state registrar also contain an edited layer.

Questions have also been raised about the number at the top of the document issued by the Department of Health, number 61 10641, as one part of the number is in a separate layer when viewed in Illustrator, as demonstrated in the video above. This may prove to be significant. A long form birth certificate obtained by the Honolulu Star in 2009 from a female born one day after Obama and whose form was accepted three days after Obama’s document contains a Dept. of Health number that is lower, 61 10637. There are other subtle differences, such as the use of “Aug.” for the date rather than “August,” and the use of “Honolulu, Oahu” rather than “Honolulu, Hawaii” (seen also in the 1962 certificate below) which may or may not be significant.

More to the point, this certificate and others, like the one posted below it, have visible seals. No issuing seal can be seen on the document released today by Obama.
Negative of long form birth certificate for Aug. 5, 1961 birth in Honolulu, released in 1966 with seal and dated signatures.Published by Honolulu Star and World Net Daily in 2009.
New Obama Birth Certificate is a Forgery 090728birthcert
Photo of physical copy of long form birth certificate for June 15, 1962 birth in Honolulu, also with visible seal.
New Obama Birth Certificate is a Forgery 13

Infowars will continue to analyze this issue as more information comes in. It is significant that the Obama Administration was pressured into responding to this controversy, whatever the final analysis of this document. However, the administration still needs to release his other records which have been sealed at great expense. Is there an issue with his being naturalized in Indonesia? Why are his college records at Columbia and Occidental sealed, and what do they contain? Did Obama travel to Pakistan on a foreign passport? These questions and many others have not been properly answered.

Aaron Dykes contributed to this report.